High-throughput analytical approach combining automated sample preparation and gas chromatography with universal carbon response
Introduction
In recent years, the chemical, pharmaceutical, and agricultural industries have been rapidly evolving to more complex processes and products [1], [2]. This higher complexity in modern synthesis processes often translates into the necessity of identifying and analyzing a significant number of side products and impurities. To overcome the increase in workload added by these challenges, many companies and research organizations are heavily investing in automation and high-throughput capabilities. Accurate measurement of analytical process parameters is critical to any successful product development, and this work has traditionally been very time consuming due to the need for standards calibration, sample preparation, and data processing. It has become a tremendous challenge in modern analytical laboratories to generate more data with higher complexity, limited workforce, and tight timelines for process and product development.
Gas chromatography is a mature and established analytical technique commonly practiced in most industrial and academic laboratories. Recent developments in equipment and software automation capabilities, in combination with advancements in the detection and quantification for gas chromatography, have made significant improvements in streamlining the process of evaluating complex samples. Robots that can automate the sample injection process (autosamplers) have been available for a few decades, and in some cases can perform a variety of simple sample preparation steps. The complexity of the operations that need to be performed and the need for advanced training for qualified personnel are common limitations for adopting these technologies.
Over the last few years, further advancements in robotic autosamplers have been made with technologies that enable, for a first time, the automatic exchange of multiple tools to perform the most common injection techniques, including split/splitless, on-column, headspace, and solid phase micro extraction [3]. Basic operations such as using several syringes of different volumes to perform dilutions or avoiding carry over across different types of samples have provided significant advantages over previous technologies. This level of automation enabled these systems to combine multiple injection techniques in the same sequence, without requiring the user to change any of these tools manually. These advancements in robotics and autosampler instrumentation can be readily coupled to a gas chromatograph to automate several common steps required during the sample preparation for a large number of samples and to perform the injection to initiate the method.
The flame ionization detector (FID) is the most popular detector for gas chromatography. Some advantages of using the FID are its large linear dynamic range (107), robustness, signal stability, sensitivity, ease of use, affordability, and low maintenance cost [4]. The main drawback is that it does not provide any selectivity or information about the compounds detected other than the fact that they can emit ions when burning in a hydrogen flame. While the FID is strictly not a universal detector, nearly any compound that contains carbon and hydrogen will provide a response. Another important aspect of the FID is that the signal generated by the compounds is proportional to the amount of carbon present in the gas stream being analyzed [5]. This property can provide a reasonable estimation of the amount of each compound in the sample when compared to an adequate surrogate substance if the standard is not available (e.g., analysis of complex samples) [6]. While such estimation can provide reasonably good accuracy for the analysis of hydrocarbons, the error can be drastically larger and is affected not only by the elemental composition of the analyte but also by the nature of the specific functional groups present in the molecules [7].
Recently, Dauenhauer et al. [8] published an article highlighting the implementation of a two-step micro-reactor that oxidizes all the analytes eluting from the GC column to carbon dioxide in a first step and then converts them into methane in a second step. This method not only enables the FID to have a more uniform response per carbon base, but also significantly improves the sensitivity for the detection of compounds that typically have a low response to the FID (such as low molecular weight aldehydes and organic acids). Most importantly, the use of this micro-reactor to convert the components eluting from the GC column to methane (and water) eliminates the need for calibration and analytical standards since the response is proportional to the moles of carbon atoms contained in each one of these molecules [20].
In this manuscript, we focus on a case study that describes the implementation of a high-throughput GC system equipped with a robotic autosampler and the micro-reactor coupled to an FID. This configuration enables the instrument to perform a number of sample preparation steps using a variety of diluents, internal standards, and different injection techniques without user intervention. The micro-reactor in-line with the FID eliminates the necessity of the external standard calibration and increases the response for several species. This capability resulted in a dramatic improvement in the analytical throughput with minimal operator involvement by eliminating the need for standard calibration and sample preparation.
Section snippets
Chemicals
The following materials and concentrations were used for the test solutions: ethanol (3.88 mg/mL) and octanol (3.62 mg/mL) were acquired from Acros Organics. Dimethylformamide (DMF, 5.06 mg/mL) and 2-nonanone (4.21 mg/mL) were acquired from Alfa-Aesar. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 5.78 mg/mL), toluene (4.47 mg/mL), acetone (diluent), isopropanol (IPA, 3.89 mg/mL), ethyl acetate (4.57 mg/mL), and 1-butanol (4.07 mg/mL) were acquired from Fisher-Scientific. 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF,
Automation for sample preparation and GC analysis
The automation of sample preparation has been widely used in biology and microbiology laboratories due to the parallel, miniaturized, and cost-efficient processing of a large number of samples that typically need to be evaluated in these fields. The feasibility for automation is in part due to the similarity and repetitive nature inherent in many of the operations and methods that need to be performed. When considering the analytical laboratory, there have also been several offerings that
Method development and implementation
The process starts with a precise definition of the sample requirements to ensure that this capability is compatible with the sample properties and the analytical objectives. This process was performed by analyzing the samples using two different method conditions, and analyzing the data using ACD/GC Simulator software to build a linear model of the retention of the different analytes. Once the model is generated, the method can be optimized in silico and, once the optimal conditions have been
Conclusions
An analytical workflow was developed for the automation, analysis, and data processing supporting at-line process analytical. Modeling software tools were utilized for fast method optimization and implementation. This original implementation was presented for the automation of the sample preparation and the analysis of multi-component samples using an internal standard and the micro-reactor with an FID for calibration. This system provides a dramatic improvement over previous capabilities for
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge constructive discussions and help for instrument optimization from Agilent Technologies, Activated Research Company, and CTC Analytics. We would also like to thank Dr. Lisa Powers and our reviewers for the thorough revisions and comments helping us to improve the manuscript.
References (20)
Aspects of the mechanism of the flame ionization detector
J. Chromatogr. A
(1999)- et al.
Sulfur poisoning of nickel methanation catalysts: I. In situ deactivation by H2S of nickel and nickel bimetallics
J. Catal.
(1979) Chemisorption of hydrogen sulfide on a supported nickel catalyst
J. Catal.
(1968)- et al.
A data-driven strategy for predicting greenness scores, rationally comparing synthetic routes and benchmarking PMI outcomes for the synthesis of molecules in the pharmaceutical industry
Green Chem.
(2017) - et al.
High-throughput simultaneous analysis of pesticides by supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry
J. Agric. Food Chem.
(2015) CTC Analytics - PAL Systems
(2019)- et al.
Chapter 10 methodology detectors for gas chromatography, for laboratory analyses and on-line process control
J. Chromatogr. Lib.
(1988) Response factors for gas chromatographic analyses
J. Chromatogr. Sci.
(1967)- et al.
The Mechanism of Response of Flame Ionization Detectors
(1962) - et al.
Quantitative carbon detector (QCD) for calibration-free, high-resolution characterization of complex mixtures
Lab. Chip
(2015)
Cited by (0)
- 1
Current address: DuPont Experimental Station, 200 Powder Mill Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19803.